
if staff are our greatest asset why don't we show it?
Staff: Our greatest asset? Don't tell us, show us.
By Darren Caveney
In a recent conversation about intranets and internal communications I fessed up on a theory I have developed.
Staff intranets, we know, are generally unengaging resources, crammed with slabs of info but offering very little in the way of interaction or honest, two-way conversation.
But my theory is that this has very little to do with the intranet sites themselves – they’re just a symptom of a much larger organisational and cultural problem which is that too many organisations – when push comes to shove – don’t truly value their staff. There, I've said it.
Organisations that fall into this bracket often have poorly resourced internal communications full stop. So it’s little wonder that their intranet is 10-years old. Staff are simply not being valued enough. They’re too low down in the priorities pecking order.
My theory isn't based on hard evidence or a robust piece of research. It’s based upon anecdotal evidence from talking to lots of folks and organisations over the past year about internal communications issues and how we can improve it.
Of course when you make any broad, sweeping statements like these there are always plenty of examples of where this is not the case. But I would hazard a semi-educated guess right now that if we conducted a poll across the public sector we'd find some worrying results on the topic of staff feeling valued.
We’ve known for many years that staff are our greatest asset. It makes complete business sense. And smart, successful organisations tap into this - happy, trusted staff are more productive, more likely to innovate, less likely to leave and can become natural, unforced ambassadors for an organisation.
And I’m sure that if asked, all organisations and leaders would say that their staff are their greatest asset.
But don't tell us, show us, as someone famous once said.
This lack of value manifests itself in a whole host of ways, from lowly staff survey scores not being acted upon, staff not trusted to venture onto the internet in their lunch breaks and, worst of the lot, staff finding out about jobs cuts first via the local newspaper or blog instead of face-to-face from the horse’s mouth.
The answer to this doesn't include plastering the office walls with organisational 'values' and hoping some of it sticks either. I once read that if you walk into an organisation for an interview or for a first day at work and the organisational values are sat proudly on the office wall you should turn around and leave immediately. It’s almost certainly a sign that there is a staff engagement problem within that organisation.
Another symptom of this lack of appreciation is the number of internal comms staff working in public sector organisations. Accepted good practice has for years said that organisations should employ on average one internal comms person for every 1,000 employees. Can you think of any organisations that do this? I’m struggling.
Now there’s no chance of a concerted internal comms recruitment drive taking place across the sector to tackle this so it’s going to be down to existing staff from other disciples to push for change, and for more senior managers to lighten up, trust the staff they, after all, pay salaries to each month, and demonstrate that staff really are our greatest assets.
So you see having a bad intranet is more likely a symptom of duff, 1970s-style command and control leadership than any deliberate ploy to create and provide poor intranets.
So, what next?
Working together in a safe, trusted environment where innovation is encouraged, where two-way respect exists and where honesty and telling staff the facts, first and face-to-face is the only way the public sector will emerge intact as we enter the next five-years of impactful financial cuts to our organisations.
You can spot the smart organisations with leaders who know this and are trying to deliver positive change for the greater good. My hope is that they will shine like sparkly beacons and encourage and force others to follow suit.
So if your intranet is rubbish, ask yourself the bigger question about why, and have a think about the ways in which you can force your own positive changes, no matter how small if may be.
And, creating a new intranet, a social one, where staff feel able to share honest views without repercussion, might just have a much bigger impact than we think.
Darren Caveney is co-creator of comms2point0 and vice chair of LGcomms
Image via Flickr Creative Commons
Reader Comments (2)
Hit the nail on the head there like with the line "1970s style command and control leadership".
The authoritive dictator style leadership might have worked a charm in the manual labor, repetitive, physical, low mental effort jobs of back when. It probably worked fine in the office equivalent of the factory process line. But when you're working on projects and in jobs that require far more cognitive effort and skill, this style couldn't be more ill fitted.
This issue is more apparent for people either just leaving uni and entering the workforce or those, like me, who are experienced, but still part of the millennial generation. For me, and many others, I don't see a boss as the big dog, the head honcho. I see a boss like I see everyone else at work, at home and in life, which is as a person.
A peer to peer relationship is the only way to be truly productive and collaborative because, as soon as there's more power, weight and authority on one side, there's an imbalance. This imbalance creates unfairness in the relationship and this unfairness causes the lighter party to feel less significant, less valued and more suppressed. And you couldn't put your staff in a worse mental state!
These days, being an over the top authoritive and a hard task master is more likely to get you laughed out of the room than inspire productivity. Not because we don't respect the boss, not because we disagree with what needs doing, but because that's not how people function. That's not a reciprocal relationship. And reciprocal relationships are what's needed to create motivated and productive staff in today's stressful, long and mentally intense days at work.
If you're a leader looking to create a better environment for staff or to brush up on your motivational skills, check out this video from the RSA. It's only short, but is well worth your time.
Thank you for such an interesting and enjoyable article. You touch upon so many unfortunate aspects of all too many organisations'. Culture is of course a central factor, which permeates so much of this topic area. If I may mention Peter Drucker, he indicated that 'Culture eats strategy for breakfast'. If that statement has merit (and our experience suggests it does), then the culture of an organisation will indeed be represented in its activities (and neglect) in and of various areas, despite what strategies may be espoused by senior management. Worse still if the strategies of senior management are not appropriate, or there is a lack of true engagement with staff, then failure is likely. Some fundamentals are first and foremost Trust, which enables open communication and leads to staff feeling valued. Values, attitudes and beliefs are key and in this context we have organisational an individual values which create a fascinating and diverse range of views. I will stop at this point, as it's my first contribution and I don't want to go on : -)